Legal Opinion

Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1988No. 87-638PublishedCited by 462 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

In the instant appeal, appellant is seeking further review of the trial court’s judgment overruling her Civ. R. 60(B) motion on the basis that appellant had not sustained her burden of demonstrating that ,her failure to file a timely answer in this cause was due to excusable neglect. *19The specific issue posed to this court involves the quantum of evidence necessary to prove entitlement to relief on the grounds enumerated in Civ. R. 60 (B)(1).2

As we review the question of the sufficiency of appellant’s motion, we are confronted at the outset with the absence from the record of a transcript of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Colley v. BazellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Svoboda v. City of BrunswickOhio Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by462 opinions

  1. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

457 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API