Legal Opinion

Hewes v. McLellan

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1889No. 9652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Ejectment. The plaintiff based his right to recover on two tax deeds alike in form. The deeds were offered in evidence, and excluded on the defendants’ objection. This left the plaintiff without any evidence of title, and judgment of nonsuit was rendered against him, from which he appeals.

The only question in the case is as to the validity of these tax deeds. They were objected to on the following grounds: “1. The deed shows that fifty cents was charged for the certificate, and hence the tax sale was for too much by fifty cents; 2. The tax collector offered the entire lot for sale, instead of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Doland v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Horsky v. McKennanMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rothchild Bros. v. RollingerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Tilton v. RussekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Gibson v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hayes v. DucasseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API