Doland v. Mooney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the-opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
Action to quiet title. At the trial plaintiff offered in evidence to support his claim of title a certificate of tax sale and a tax deed. • The certificate was admitted; the deed was excluded. The ruling of the court in excluding the deed is assigned as error.
Respondent contends that the deed is void because it does not recite the matters recited in the certificate. We have examined the particulars in which the deed differs from the certificate, and are of the opinion that none of them are material.
In the certificate it is stated that the taxes and costs amount in all to the sum of $35.71. In…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Horsky v. McKennanMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Rothchild Bros. v. RollingerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Hewes v. McLellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Rollins v. WoodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sanborn v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1912