Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Big Four Bus Lines
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 10, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Rees —
-Affirming.
The appellants, owners and operators of taxicabs, brought this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act to test the validity of section 21a, chapter 112 of the Acts of 1926. Each of the appellees has been granted a permit by the commissioner of motor transportation to operate motor buses over a highway between certain fixed termini in Harlan county. The appellants have not applied for a permit to operate between these fixed termini, but insist that section 21a, chapter 112 of the Acts of 1926 is invalid on account of being in violation of section…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smallwood v. JeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Greeley Transportation Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- In Re JamesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Reo Bus Lines Company v. Southern Bus Line CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People's Transit Co. v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Eastridge v. Southeastern Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Arneson v. DennyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- Crigger & Stepp v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927