Greeley Transportation Co. v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
The people, by the attorney general, obtained an injunction restraining plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, from carrying on the business of transporting passengers for hire by automobile between certain designated points and in competition with railways, until it should obtain a “certificate of convenience and necessity” from the public utilities commission. To review that judgment defendant brings error.
The assignments which are argued, and which require consideration, may be thus grouped: 1. The Utilities Act is unconstitutional because: (a) The subject matter is not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ex Parte TindallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- In re Senate Resolution No. 4Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Frost v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- McKay v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- People ex rel. Park Reservoir Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Davis v. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BennettMontana Supreme Court · 1928
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.