Legal Opinion

Crigger & Stepp v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 25, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Drury,

Commissioner — Reversing in part and affirming in part.

Crigger & Stepp, a partnership, which we shall hereafter refer to as the bus operator, began this action on June 9,1926, against J. W. Allen, whom we shall refer to. as the taxi man. The'bus operator bad fully complied with Ky. Stat. Supp. 1926, sections 2739j-l to 2739j-29, inclusive, and held a certificate entitling the said bus operator to operate motor vehicles, busses, etc., between Williamson, W. Va., and McVeigh, Ky., was prepared to so serve the public, and was so .doing, along a route designated as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Interstate Busses Corp. v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Cannon Ball Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Northern Kentucky Transportation Co. v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. V. T. C. Lines, Inc. v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API