Legal Opinion

Eastridge v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 24, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Perry

Affirming.

The appellee, Southeastern Greyhound Lines, holds a certificate of convenience and necessity, issued it by the Director of Motor Transportation, authorizing it to operate motor buses for the transportation of passengers for hire over Highway 60 from Lexington to Louisville, via Versailles and Frankfort.

■ The appellant, T. W. Eastridge, has acquired by purchase and lease two permits, Nos. 123 and 185, the first authorizing its holder to operate motor bus service for hire from Lexington to Midway, over' the route of the Leestown Pike, as therein…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Clark v. PoorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lancaster Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Enid Transfer Storage Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Phillips v. Southeastern Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. Century-Matthews Motor Freight, Inc. v. ThrunCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. Hazard-Hyden Bus Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API