Legal Opinion

Reo Bus Lines Company v. Southern Bus Line Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Affirming.

This action involves the validity and construction of1 certain sections of chapter 81 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1924, entitled:

“An act providing for ■ additional supervision and regulation of the transportation of persons, for compensation, over public highways by motor propelled vehicles; defining automobile transportation companies providing for additional supervision and regulation thereof by the State Highway Commission or its successors; providing for the assessment and collection of fees and taxes thereon, and providing for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Patterson v. WollmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cutrona v. Mayor of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pennington v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Suddreth v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Iowa Motor Vehicle Ass'n v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. People's Transit Co. v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. CHECKER, INCORPORATED v. Public Service CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API