Legal Opinion

Janes v. Otis Engineering Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1988No. S-1665PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal is from an order granting Otis Engineering Corporation’s (Otis) motion for summary judgment on the legality of its system of dual hourly pay to its employees. The issue presented is whether that pay system violates our wage and hour laws and accompanying regulations. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Otis maintains shops and employees to provide services to major oil companies on the North Slope and the Kenai Peninsula. It utilizes a variable hourly pay plan that incorporates…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Alaska Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Williams v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Torkko/Korman/Engineers v. Penland VenturesAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Director, Labor & Industrial Division, New Mexico Department of Labor v. Echostar Communications Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Ganz v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. ShookAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Corman v. JWS of N.M., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  5. Piquniq Management Corp. v. ReevesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API