Legal Opinion

Torkko/Korman/Engineers v. Penland Ventures

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1983No. 6489PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This appeal arises from a dispute over the validity of a mechanic’s lien filed by Tork-ko/Korman/Engineers (TKE) against an undeveloped parcel of land in Anchorage leased by Penland Ventures (Penland) from the State of Alaska. The superior court, ruling on the validity of the lien during foreclosure proceedings, held that TKE’s lien was untimely and therefore a nullity. Final judgment was entered in favor of Penland and this appeal followed. We affirm, but on an alternative ground.

I

In July 1971, Robert C. Penney executed on behalf of Penland, Inc. a lease with the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brown v. WoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Goebel v. National Exchangors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Grimes v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. DaMac Drilling, Inc. v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  4. Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. Kroh Bros. DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  5. Janes v. Otis Engineering Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API