Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Alaska Department of Labor
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted by the superior court. Its sole issue is the validity of 8 AAC 15.-100(d)(3), 1 a regulation promulgated by the Department of Labor which prohibits the “flexible work week” (FWW), purportedly under the authority of the Alaska Wage and Hour Act. The superior court conclud ed the regulation was valid, and Dresser Industries (Dresser) has appealed. We affirm.
The case was presented to the superior court on the basis of the parties’ “Stipulations of facts, issues, and procedure,” providing in part:
1. Dresser…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- McGinnis v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Inniss v. Tandy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Vest v. First National Bank of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Cragle v. GrayAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- State, Department of Labor, Wage & Hour Division v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.