Legal Opinion

Williams v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1981No. 4721PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This appeal involves a challenge to the superior court’s application of Alaska Civil Rule 56, in an action for damages for personal injuries. Appellant Leslie Williams contends that there were genuine issues of material fact barring entry of summary judgment in favor of appellee, the Municipality of Anchorage. We reverse.

Williams, plaintiff in the court below, was employed as first mate aboard the ocean tug M/V Kirt Chouest. On October 12, 1975, the M/V Kirt Chouest docked at the Port of Anchorage, a facility owned and operated by the Municipality of Anchorage. During…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jefferson County School District R-1 v. Justus ex rel. JustusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Alaskan Village, Inc. v. Smalley Ex Rel. SmalleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Casey v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Riley v. NORTHERN COM'L CO., MACHINERY DIV.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API