Legal Opinion
Mortimer v. Young
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 1942No. Civ. 13065PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action against the defendants Young and Rodes and obtained judgment against Bodes, but was nonsuited as to Young. The trial court then granted a new trial to Bodes. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment of nonsuit and the order granting a new trial. Both were affirmed and the defendants were awarded their costs of that appeal. (See Mortimer v. Young, (1940) 37 Cal. App. (2d) 164 [98 P. (2d) 1061].) The defendants had execution issued on their judgment for costs of appeal and levied it on the plaintiff’s causes of action in this action by service of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Everts v. Will S. Fawcett Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Stanley v. WestoverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Finley v. WinklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Darden v. ReeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Foote v. FooteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Jordan v. Hopkins (In re Jordan)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.