Rauer v. Hertweck
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action was brought to set aside an execution sale of real estate. The court below granted the motion of the defendants for a nonsuit, and thereupon entered judgment in their favor. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
In October, 1910, one Webb brought an action against Bauer and others to quiet his title to certain lands in Fresno County, and, in June, 1912, obtained judgment against Bauer quieting his title, and for costs amounting to $15.90. On December 19, 1912, an execution was issued on said judgment for costs. The sheriff levied the writ upon a tract of real estate in Fresno…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of RicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Hanley v. California Bridge & Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- 6 Angels, Inc. v. Stuart-Wright Mortgage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.