Legal Opinion
Turner v. Donovan
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1944No. Civ. Nos. 14172, 14173PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.
The defendant in this ease appears as both a judgment debtor and a judgment creditor. He obtained a judgment for $3,544 against one H. W. Bateman, a resident of Montana, in the United States District Court for the District of Montana. A judgment was entered against the defendant, in the Los Angeles County action before us, in 1939. Making use of a writ of execution issued upon the Los Angeles County judgment, the sheriff of Siskiyou County served a garnishment upon Bateman, who accommodatingly appeared in this state for the purpose, and thereafter sold the $3,544 judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bateman v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Ware v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Everts v. Will S. Fawcett Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Medical Finance Assn. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Takehara v. H. C. Muddox Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Daylin Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
- Roseburg Loggers, Inc. v. U.S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Atiya v. Di BartoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.