Finley v. Winkler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
Plaintiff Lyle Finley was the driver and plaintiff Ruth Hershey was a passenger in an automobile which collided with another car driven by'defendant. Plaintiffs brought this action alleging negligence on the part of defendant, and the latter answered alleging contributory negligence on the part of driver Finley, and also filed a cross-complaint. The case was tried by the court without a jury, findings were waived, and judgment was that neither plaintiffs nor defendant recover judgment for damages. Plaintiffs appeal. Sometime after the accident and after filing of the complaint, but before…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Scott v. McPheetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- B. C. Richter Contracting Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Parker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bensinger v. DavidsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.