Legal Opinion

Pascoe v. Morrison

California Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13443PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

By this action plaintiff seeks to have a written agreement for the exchange of real properties reformed and, as reformed, specifically enforced or, in the event specific performance cannot be had, an award of damages based on defendant’s alleged failure to comply with the terms of the agreement. At the inception of the trial the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. This objection was sustained and from the judgment on the pleadings the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant does not contend that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Haffey v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Durst v. JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API