Durst v. Jolly
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The complaint was filed in January, 1915, and is in the usual form of an action to quiet title, the lands involved being ranch property in the counties of Yuba and Placer.
The defendants, A. Jolly, Raphael Jolly, and Mrs. Minnie Jolly, filed an answer in which they admitted that plaintiffs were the owners of the lands in question but denied that they (plaintiffs) were entitled to the possession thereof. Defendants A. Jolly and Raphael Jolly admitted “that they assert a claim and interest in and to said lands, and to the possession thereof, . . . but they deny that Mrs. Minnie Jolly . . . has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Morrill v. Tehama Consolidated Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Los Angeles Immigration & Cooperative Ass'n v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Martin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Pascoe v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Producers Fruit Co. v. GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.