Legal Opinion

Merchants Nat. Bk. v. Continental Nat. Bk.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1929No. Docket No. 5170PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action by respondent bank seeking to recover from appellant bank the amount of a check drawn upon and paid by the former, after indorsement by the latter, under circumstances to be hereinafter related. The trial in the court below was had upon a stipulation as to the facts, which was supplemented by the testimony of but one witness, the assistant cashier of respondent bank. From the findings of the learned trial court, which closely follow said…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. King v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. In Re GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API