Legal Opinion

Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1923No. L. A. No. 7099PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

By the judgment in this case the plaintiff recovered from the defendant the sum of $18,576.98 and costs. The defendant recovered a like amount and costs from the intervener. Both the defendant and the intervener appeal. The facts appear to he as follows: For many years prior to September, 1918, the plaintiff had been a depositor of The Farmers and Merchants National Bank, the defendant. At the time the account was opened the treasurer of the plaintiff corporation received a pass-book which contained what purported to be an “Agreement with Depositor,” and which provided in substance that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Shipman v. Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API