Legal Opinion

In Re Goddard

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1937No. Crim. 2061PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

It is contended that petitioner was committed by the committing magistrate on a criminal charge without reasonable or probable cause. (Sec. 1487, Pen. Code.)

The petition sets forth, in part, that petitioner was charged with a violation of subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, of section 337a of the Penal Code. It is further alleged in the petition that the evidence adduced at the preliminary examination, a copy of which is attached to the petition and made a part thereof, discloses the following facts to be true, and which the petitioner herein admits to be true, to wit:

“That on or about…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Seaboard Acceptance Corp. v. ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McKay v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hale v. McGettiganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In-Home Supportive Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. JermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API