Legal Opinion
King v. Mortimer
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1948No. Civ. 13304, 13305PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The plaintiff and appellant sued as assignee and “on behalf of” a number of depositors in the Pacific States Savings and Loan Company. A list of the various assignors and the amount of their claims was attached as an exhibit and made a part of the complaint.
The actions were consolidated for the purposes of the demurrer, and are treated together throughout.
The complaint is framed in two counts, differing in prayers only, as hereinafter mentioned.
After alleging the corporate existence of the defendant Pacific States Company and the official capacity of the defendant Frank C. Mortimer as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Marina Tenants Ass'n v. Deauville Marina Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.