Legal Opinion

People v. Clapp

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1944No. Crim. 4528PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendants appeal from judgments convicting them of the crime of abortion and from an order denying their motions for a new trial. Their convictions were based on the testimony of Thelma Huntley, who underwent the illegal operation, and of Alice Huntley and Alice Thurman, her mother-in-law and sister-in-law, who were present during the operation, which took place in Thelma Huntley’s home.

Defendants attack the judgments on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. They claim that all three witnesses were accomplices and that their testimony therefore needed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Dunn v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. People v. GarceauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API