Legal Opinion
United States v. Wright
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided January 13, 2015No. ACM 2014-10PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT
HECKER, Senior Judge and WEBER, Judge:
The Government filed an interlocutory appeal under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862, in this matter. The military judge abated the proceedings after the Government refused to comply with his order to disclose materials the Government asserted were privileged. The Government appealed this abatement order. We conclude that the military judge’s ruling was incomplete and ambiguous- in that he should have taken further steps to define what materials were appropriate for in camera review. We therefore grant the Government’s appeal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Bruce R. Lindsey (Grand Jury Testimony)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. ChisumUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- United States v. Al-NashiriSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.