Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1997No. 96-4108PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The Office of Independent Counsel (OIC) appeals from an order of the District Court denying the OIC’s motion to compel the production of documents subpoenaed by a federal grand jury. We reverse and remand.
I
The task assigned to Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr is to investigate and prosecute matters “relating in any way to James B. McDougal’s, President William Jefferson Clinton’s, or Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s relationships with Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association, Whitewater Development Corporation, or Capital Management Services, Inc.” In re Madison…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- In Re Bruce R. Lindsey (Grand Jury Testimony)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Reed v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David Phillip Munoz Bennie E. McGregor Donald L. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.