In Re Bruce R. Lindsey (Grand Jury Testimony)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
■ Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
Opinion dissenting from Part II and concurring in part and dissenting in part from Part III filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion of President William Jefferson Clinton and the Office of the President, to unseal the sealed portions of this Court’s opinion in In re: Bruce R. Lindsey (Grand Jury Testimony), 148 F.3d 1100 (D.C.Cir.1998), and the response of the United States of America, acting through the Office of the Independent Counsel, it is
ORDERED, that the redacted portions of this Court’s opinion in In re: Bruce R.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In Re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Ryan Karnoski v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Herlancer Ross v. City of Memphis, Walter Crews and Alfred Gray, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.