United States v. Al-Nashiri
Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act
1Opinion of the Court
On February 16, 2018, military commission judge (military judge) Vance H. Spath ruled that the trial of Abd Al-Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Al-Nashiri (Al-Nashiri) was indefinitely abated until a superior court orders him to resume. Tr. 12,297-98; Mil. J. Spath Resp. to Order (Mar. 26, 2018). Appellant timely filed an interlocutory appeal of that ruling under 10 U.S.C. § 950d(a)(1). Appellant Br. (Mar. 5, 2018).1
*1196We reverse the military judge's decision to indefinitely abate the proceedings and order Al-Nashiri's trial to resume.
I. Statement of the Case
Our superior Court has "recount[ed] the details…
2Cases cited119 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.