Legal Opinion

United States v. Al-Nashiri

Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act

Decided October 11, 2018No. CMCR 18-002Published

1Opinion of the Court

On February 16, 2018, military commission judge (military judge) Vance H. Spath ruled that the trial of Abd Al-Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Al-Nashiri (Al-Nashiri) was indefinitely abated until a superior court orders him to resume. Tr. 12,297-98; Mil. J. Spath Resp. to Order (Mar. 26, 2018). Appellant timely filed an interlocutory appeal of that ruling under 10 U.S.C. § 950d(a)(1). Appellant Br. (Mar. 5, 2018).1

*1196We reverse the military judge's decision to indefinitely abate the proceedings and order Al-Nashiri's trial to resume.

I. Statement of the Case

Our superior Court has "recount[ed] the details…

2Cases cited119 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API