Legal Opinion

MacK v. Ferebee

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1964No. Appeal, 236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

In this action of trespass plaintiff-appellee recovered a verdict for personal injuries allegedly sustained when struck by defendant-appellant’s automobile. This appeal is from the judgment entered on that verdict after the appellant’s motion for judgment n.o.v.' was denied. The sole issue before us is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.

There were no eyewitnesses to the actual happening of the accident. However, all of the evidence which was submitted to the jury must be read in the light most advantageous to the appellee, all conflicts therein…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnston v. DickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Hallbauer v. ZARFOSSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Bashore v. Publix Shirt Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Murphy v. Bargain City, U.S.A., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Smith v. PittmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borsa v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Neyman v. SoutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Bloom v. HILTYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Payne v. WHEELERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API