Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Dick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1960No. Appeal, 200PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Bok,

The jury found both defendant and additional defendant negligent and gave plaintiff a reasonable verdict for his burns. The court below granted judgment n.o.v. and plaintiff has appealed.

To complete the procedural posture of the case, plaintiff brought his suit one day before the Statute of Limitations expired, and service was made on the defendant after its expiration. Defendant promptly moved to bring in the additional defendant, but because the statute had already run, the only liability that could be asserted against the additional defendant was its liability…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Pope v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Giordano v. Clement Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Muroski v. HnathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Ranck v. SauderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Lescznski v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Noel v. PUCKETTSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Devenney v. North Franklin Township Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Folmar v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API