Legal Opinion

Bloom v. HILTY

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1967No. Appeal, 79PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

George Bloom, plaintiff-appellee, in this action of replevin, seeks to recover 4,100 feet of 3% inch drill pipe, Rotary Air Hose and Connections, 1 set Bash and Ross 3% inch slips, 24 piece insert slips, and 4 subs for drill pipe (being pipe and equipment used in drilling operations). His claim is based on a written lease-purchase agreement he entered into with one of the defendants, Charles D. Hilty, dated May 12, 1964, which provides for a monthly rental of $500 payable June 1, 1964, and each month thereafter for five years with a provision that “. . . upon the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. CASTERLINE v. GMACSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Johnson v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Casterline v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Carroll v. GoddingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Packard Motor Car Co. v. MazerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bloom v. HiltySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Horizon Financial, F.A. v. HansenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  3. Kay Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. McGovern Auto Specialty, Inc. (In Re McGovern Auto Specialty, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. McCarthy v. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Gibson v. Steger (In Re Gibson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API