Legal Opinion

Neyman v. Soutter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1964No. Appeal, 241PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

Erma Soutter has appealed from the refusal of the court below to grant her motion for judgment n.o.v. or a new trial after a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against both defendants. The other defendant, Harry Soutter, is the natural son of Erma Soutter. He was adopted by her parents, his grandparents, and lived with them until their death. In 1951 Erma also joined the household but Harry apparently regarded her as a sister, and regarded his grandparents who had adopted him, as his parents. The four lived together until the death of Erma’s father. Thereafter Erma, Harry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Anderson v. Bushong Pontiac Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. MacK v. FerebeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Norman I. Suchomajcz, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Suchomajcz, a Minor v. Hummel Chemical Company, Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Boyce v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A., Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Midgette v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API