Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pittman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1959No. Appeal, 160PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McBride,

This is an appeal from the entry of judgment upon the verdict of a jury for plaintiff, Smith, in a trespass action. Having moved for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial, defendant, Pittman, asks us to review the propriety of the court’s refusal to grant both motions. Plaintiff was walking across West High Street in the Borough of Carlisle in a southwardly direction in the pedestrian crosswalk which crossed West High Street immediately west of the intersection of Court House Avenue and West High Street. This intersection is more than 100 feet west of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lorah v. RinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Rhoads v. HerbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Goodall v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Aaron v. StrausserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Smith v. WistarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caine v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Reuter v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Deibold v. SommervilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. MacK v. FerebeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Abira Medical Laboratories, LLC v. Cigna Health And Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API