Humburg v. Lotz
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. A. L. Rhodes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The facts, as shown by the findings and the evidence, are substantially as follows: Defendant is a brother of Augustus Lotz, who was, during the years 1903 and 1904, the president of the “Sanitary Compressed Air and Suction Dust Removing Company,” a corporation doing business in California, and which was at the times herein named the owner of certain letters patent for certain automatic air dust removing and cleaning devices, and portable wagons, used in its business. In the early part of the year 1903 the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- King v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Richards v. FraserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Andrews v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.