Fink v. Weisman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
Separate appeals are prosecuted by defendant William Weisman and defendant Joseph Toplitzky from a judgment entered against both defendants pursuant to the verdict of a jury. The action was to recover secret profits in the purchase of four separate pieces of real property in each of which plaintiff Fink purchased a one-half interest through defendant Weisman at a price in excess of that- agreed by Weisman to be paid to the vendor. Defendant Toplitzky was interested in the transaction as a real estate broker and since the relationship between Fink and Weisman in the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Donahue v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. Bestline Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hirsch v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.