Legal Opinion

Fink v. Weisman

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1933No. Docket No. 8665PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

Separate appeals are prosecuted by defendant William Weisman and defendant Joseph Toplitzky from a judgment entered against both defendants pursuant to the verdict of a jury. The action was to recover secret profits in the purchase of four separate pieces of real property in each of which plaintiff Fink purchased a one-half interest through defendant Weisman at a price in excess of that- agreed by Weisman to be paid to the vendor. Defendant Toplitzky was interested in the transaction as a real estate broker and since the relationship between Fink and Weisman in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Donahue v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. Bestline Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Hirsch v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API