Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Visser

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1997No. C1-96-930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Earl Visser, d/b/a Visser Trenching (Vis-ser), appeals from judgment in favor of respondent Perry Sorenson. Sorenson, an electrician employed by third-party defendant Gunderson Electric, was injured during an excavating project. Visser contends that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Sorenson’s claims. He argues that Sorenson’s sole remedy was under the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), Minn.Stat. § 176.061 (1994), because Visser and Gunder-son were engaged in a common enterprise. Visser also challenges the jury’s future damages award for loss of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carstens v. Mayers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Olson v. LyrekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Hodel v. Gundle Lining Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Olson v. LyrekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Olson v. LyrekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API