Legal Opinion
Hodel v. Gundle Lining Construction Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 30, 1997No. C8-97-1602PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Gundle Lining Corporation and its employee Tongdy Khambath (collectively Gundle) appeal from summary judgment, arguing the district court erred in ruling Gundle was equitably estopped from asserting that the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act provided the sole remedy for respondent Harold Hodel’s injuries. We reverse.
FACTS
On October 29,1994, a Gundle vehicle driven by Khambath struck Hodel as he was leaving Gundle’s worksite. Hodel claimed injuries from the collision.
Hodel filed a “First Report of Injury” with Gundle. On December 30, 1994, Gundle’s workers’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Huhn v. Foley Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bauer v. Blackduck Ambulance Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third Party v. Jason Alan Sunby, Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015