Olson v. Lyrek
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentRandall, Judge
I respectfully dissent: On these facts, I would reverse and remand for a summary judgment award in favor of Lyrek.
As the majority correctly notes, to establish the existence of a common enterprise:(1) The employers must be engaged on the same project;(2) The employees must be working together (common activity); and(3) In such a fashion that they are subject to the same or similar hazards.
McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp., 253 Minn. 501, 506, 93 N.W.2d 552, 556 (1958).
Respondent concedes that elements (1) and (2) have been met and that the only way he can prevail is to show that the two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Sorenson v. VisserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997