Legal Opinion

Olson v. Lyrek

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1998No. C4-98-117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellants Gerald J. Lyrek and Valley Rich Company, Inc. moved for summary judgment on the grounds that Lyrek and respondent Charles D. Olson were engaged in a common enterprise, thus barring a suit under the election-of-remedies provision of the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act. The district court denied the motion, finding that Lyrek and Olson had not been exposed to the same or similar hazards. We affirm.

FACTS

Egan & Sons, Olson’s employer, was awarded a plumbing contract by Opus Corporation to install sanitary sewer lines. Olson was foreman on the project.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Claussen v. City of LauderdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Olson v. LyrekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API