1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Petitioner seeks review of LCDC’s periodic review order for Yamhill County. It contends that LCDC erred by concluding that the county’s minimum parcel size requirements that permit parcels of fewer than 80 acres to be created in certain mixed agricultural/forestry (AF) zones comply with Goal 4 and OAR 660-06-026, a provision of the Goal 4 implementing rule. We affirm.
The dispute focuses on OAR 660-06-026(1), which provides:
“Governing bodies shall legislatively amend their land division standards to incorporate one or more of the following parcel sizes. Under these provisions, a governing body…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Yamhill County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Martin v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Ray v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996