Legal Opinion

Martin v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 4, 1993No. 91C-10659; CA A74234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a circuit court judgment affirming an order of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) in other than a contested case. ORS 183.484; ORS 183.500. We affirm.

In August, 1989, the city of Tigard (the city) applied to ODOT for a permit to improve a road. ODOT granted the permit, which specified a completion date of September, 1990. Because of unforeseen difficulties in obtaining the right-of-way, the project was delayed. Approximately four months after the completion date had passed, the city requested an extension. On February 20, 1991, ODOT issued an order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fadeley v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Bailey v. Board on Police Standards & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Senior Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Martin v. City of TigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Lechner v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Martin v. City of TigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API