Legal Opinion

Yamhill County v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1992No. 91-RA-792; CA A72899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Yamhill County seeks review of LCDC’s periodic review order under former ORS 197.640 to former ORS 197.647. We affirm.

The county had included as resources on its Goal 5 inventory, as revised for periodic review, the scenic waterway and watershed and potential municipal reservoir in the Walker Flat area. LCDC’s order directed the county to add three other resources in the area to its inventory — fish and wildlife habitat, natural areas and wetlands — and to complete the Goal 5 and OAR 660-16-000 et seq process for those resources. The county contends:

“LCDC, by making an independent evaluation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Urquhart v. Lane Council of GovernmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ramsey v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Department of Transportation v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Friends of Forest Park v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API