Legal Opinion
1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1988No. LCDC 84-ACK-201; CA A33755; SC S33694, S33797, S33798, S34114, S33720PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The principal issue in this land use case concerns Oregon’s Statewide Planning Goal 4, which directs that forest lands be conserved for forest use. 1 The disputes also raise important questions concerning the relationship between Goal 4 and Goal 3 2 and the respective burdens on all parties involved in the development and acknowledgment of comprehensive land use plans.
After several earlier attempts, Lane County presented its proposed comprehensive rural land use plan to the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in February 1984. LCDC’s initial response in July 1984 listed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Dodd v. Hood River CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Klamath Falls v. Environmental Quality CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.