Legal Opinion
Richie v. Tate Motors, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1971No. Civ. 38348PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHWEITZER, J.
On October 5, 1967 C. M. Finn purchased a new 1967 Pontiac from defendant Tate Motors, Inc. The sales agreement and the conditional sales contract indicate that Finn made a cash down payment of $384 and that there was no trade-in. Actually Finn delivered to Bill Canary, a salesman for Tate Motors, $284 cash, a 1958 Pontiac automobile, together with the “pink slip” thereto, endorsed in blank, and a Department of Motor Vehicle form indicating the transfer of ownership of the 1958 Pontiac to Tate Motors. (Veh. Code, § 5900.) Since the 1958 Pontiac was not acceptable to Tate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Stoddart v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Uber v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Borjesson v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Kovacs v. SturgeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Marriage of CaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Enis v. Specialty Auto SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Durbin v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Cary v. CaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973