Legal Opinion

Uber v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1967No. Civ. No. 7993PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

247 Cal.App.2d 611 (1967)

MICHAEL GENE UBER, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants; NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Civ. No. 7993.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist., Div. One.

Jan. 5, 1967.

Parker, Stanbury, McGee, Peckham & Garrett, Raymond G. Stanbury, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps and Robert G. Steiner for Defendants and Appellants.

Smith, Prante & Biggins and Robert C. Baxley for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

COUGHLIN, J.

Plaintiff sustained injuries…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. NATIONAL AMERICAN INS. v. Ins. Co. of N. AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Jordan v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. GewirtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Paul Masson Co. v. Colonial InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. EakinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API