Legal Opinion

Kovacs v. Sturgeon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1969No. Civ. 9232PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.

Plaintiff, William Kovacs, appeals from a judgment entered upon a defense verdict in a personal injury action which arose out of a collision between a motor vehicle driven by defendant, Sturgeon, and plaintiff as a pedestrian.

The principal issue of this appeal is whether' the trial court was justified, under the facts, in instructing on the doctrine of assumption of risk. We have determined it was error, serious and prejudicial, and therefore reversible to have instructed on this doctrine.

The accident happened on November 10, 1964, at about 10 p.m. when plaintiff was walking as a pedestrian…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Everly v. CreechCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Fry v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Gioldi v. SartorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Reinke v. Alliance TowingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Richie v. Tate Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. Jones CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. The People v. Merriman CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API