Legal Opinion

Borjesson v. Simpson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1960No. Civ. 18405PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J. pro tem. *

Appellant received personal injuries while a passenger in an automobile which was struck by a vehicle driven by one Simpson. Early in December, 1955, Simpson wished to buy a Ford automobile from his employer, respondent Rett-White Motor Sales Company of Walnut Creek, but none was available, as Rett-White’s dealer quota had been exhausted. Cars in excess of a dealer’s quota could be obtained if sold to a leasing agency. Cecil Whitebone, who owned 49 per cent of Rett-White, and a Ford dealership in San Francisco, organized respondent Whitebone Leasing Company, a purported…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stoddart v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Rainey v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. AETNA INS. CO. OF HARTFORDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Uber v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Laureano v. ChristensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Durbin v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Uber v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API