Legal Opinion
Enis v. Specialty Auto Sales
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1978No. Civ. 40569PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
Plaintiff, Daisy Enis, a minor, brought this action through her guardian ad litem to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she was struck by an automobile. Named as defendants were Louis Eddings, who was allegedly driving the car in a negligent manner at the time of the accident, and Specialty Auto Sales, Ronald Palombino and Stephen Dubose, who were allegedly liable as owners of the vehicle.
A stipulated judgment in the amount of $300,000 was entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Eddings, and the case then proceeded to trial against Specialty Auto…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Richardson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Stoddart v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Baker v. WadsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Valentine v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mock v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- U.S. Roofing, Inc. v. Credit Alliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Pappert v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.