Legal Opinion

Stoddart v. Peirce

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1959No. L. A. 25452PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in a personal injury action presents two questions of law not hitherto determined by the appellate courts of this state, both dependent upon a proper interpretation of section 402 of the Vehicle Code * (Owner’s Liability Law). The action arises from a collision between a vehicle in which plaintiffs were riding and a vehicle operated by the defendant Haines. Haines had purchased his ear from defendant Nance Chevrolet Company, which had previously received it from defendant Peirce as a turn in on the purchase price of another ear. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bunch v. KinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Votaw v. Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In Re CohenUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. People v. GalceranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. AETNA INS. CO. OF HARTFORDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Truck Insurance Exchange v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API