Legal Opinion

Bisconer v. Billing

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1925No. Docket No. 2863PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants as sureties on an undertaking executed by them in an action in replevin, in which one J. Tolosano was plaintiff and the plaintiff herein was defendant.

On the first day of March, 1921, said J. Tolosano brought an action in claim and delivery against Raymond Bisconer, the plaintiff herein, for the purpose of recovering the possession of a 25-Sampson sieve grip tractor and a No. 4 12-inch disc plow, said Tolosano claiming and alleging in his complaint that he was the owner of said property and that it was of the value of $2,000'; that in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bigelow v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McKinney v. PurcellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kegley v. KegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Weintraub v. WeingartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Withington v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Warfield v. RicheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API