Legal Opinion

Warfield v. Richey

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1959No. Civ. 5790PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

On November 21, 1955, plaintiffs Phillip R. Warfield and his wife Nancy Jeanette Warfield (hereinafter called plaintiffs) and Jack C. Richey (hereinafter called defendant) entered into a lease agreement whereby defendant leased to plaintiffs a hotel and motel at Needles, California, for a term of five years from December 1, 1955, at a rental of 25 per cent of the gross income. The lease contained a deposit requirement of $5,000 as lease security and $3,000 in escrow to be spent in improvements (in the case of neither deposit does the lease say where the deposit shall be made nor does it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Noble v. TweedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cornell v. WunschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Kass v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. McCoy v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API